Key result
Insertable cardiac monitor algorithm accurately estimates QT intervals with 0.93 correlation to manual measurements.
Why the study?
To determine the feasibility of long-term ICM-based QT detection by developing and validating an algorithm for continuous long-term QT monitoring in patients with an ICM.
Does an automated QT detection algorithm for insertable cardiac monitors accurately measure QT intervals compared to manual annotation in patients with ICMs?
Observational (n=132)
Single-blind
Does an automated QT detection algorithm for insertable cardiac monitors accurately measure QT intervals compared to manual annotation in patients with ICMs?
Effect estimate: Pearson's r 0.93
p-value: p=<.001
An automated QT detection algorithm for insertable cardiac monitors demonstrates high accuracy compared to manual measurement, establishing the feasibility of long-term continuous QT monitoring.
May enable automated QT monitoring via ICMs; leaves open prospective validation of clinical utility.
BACKGROUND: The QT interval is of high clinical value as QT prolongation can lead to Torsades de Pointes (TdP) and sudden cardiac death. Insertable cardiac monitors (ICMs) have the capability of detecting both absolute and relative changes in QT interval. In order to determine feasibility for long-term ICM based QT detection, we developed and validated an algorithm for continuous long-term QT monitoring in patients with ICM. METHODS: The QT detection algorithm, intended for use in ICMs, is designed to detect T-waves and determine the beat-to-beat QT and QTc intervals. The algorithm was developed and validated using real-world ICM data. The performance of the algorithm was evaluated by comparing the algorithm detected QT interval with the manually annotated QT interval using Pearson's correlation coefficient and Bland Altman plot. RESULTS: The QT detection algorithm was developed using 144 ICM ECG episodes from 46 patients and obtained a Pearson's coefficient of 0.89. The validation data set consisted of 136 ICM recorded ECG segments from 76 patients with unexplained syncope and 104 ICM recorded nightly ECG segments from 10 patients with diabetes and Long QT syndrome. The QT estimated by the algorithm was highly correlated with the truth data with a Pearson's coefficient of 0.93 (p < .001), with the mean difference between annotated and algorithm computed QT intervals of -7 ms. CONCLUSIONS: Long-term monitoring of QT intervals using ICM is feasible. Proof of concept development and validation of an ICM QT algorithm reveals a high degree of accuracy between algorithm and manually derived QT intervals.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chu et al. (2021) conducted an observational in Unexplained syncope, diabetes, and Long QT syndrome (n=132). QT detection algorithm for Insertable Cardiac Monitors vs. Manually annotated QT intervals was evaluated on Correlation between algorithm-detected and manually annotated QT intervals in the validation dataset (Pearson's r 0.93, p=<.001). The QT detection algorithm for insertable cardiac monitors accurately estimated QT intervals, demonstrating a high correlation with manually annotated QT intervals (Pearson's coefficient 0.93, p<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: