Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Seismic imaging in attenuating media requires accurate compensation for amplitude decay and phase dispersion. Conventional least-squares reverse time migration (LSRTM) methods are sensitive to this phenomenon, as the lack of compensation for dispersion and absorption can lead to low-resolution images with distorted and blurred amplitudes. A common way to overcome this problem is by applying viscoacoustic modeling based on an independent estimate of the quality factor Q (Q-LSRTM). An alternative procedure is to incorporate the attenuation estimation into Q-LSRTM in a multiparameter approach, estimating reflectivity and attenuation models within the same iterative procedure. This procedure was carried out using alternating directions (AD-Q-LSRTM). The idea was to alternate between estimating reflectivity and attenuation, iterating this process until both parameters converged. The approach was validated through numerical experiments on three synthetic models: a layered model with an attenuation anomaly, the Marmousi-II model, and a part of the BP gas reservoir model. The results demonstrated that the proposed method improved the delineation of subsurface structures, particularly in highly attenuating regions, while reducing imaging artifacts. AD-Q-LSRTM allowed the attenuation model to account for transmission losses, multiple scattering effects, and illumination variations, leading to enhanced reflectivity images. Whereas conventional Q-LSRTM relies on an a priori attenuation model (typically assuming a constant Q), this method provided a more robust solution by jointly refining both the reflectivity image and the Q model. Although challenges remain in fully recovering an accurate attenuation model due to inherent trade-offs, the proposed framework achieved significant improvements in seismic image resolution and amplitude fidelity. These findings highlight the potential of AD-Q-LSRTM as a robust tool for imaging complex subsurface environments.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Moraes et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: