Renal denervation reduced office systolic blood pressure by 17.6 mm Hg and 24-h ambulatory systolic blood pressure by 5.9 mm Hg at 6 months, though individual responses were highly variable.
Meta-Analysis (n=109)
Open-label
Yes
Treatment-resistant essential hypertension (n=109)
Renal denervation (RDN) vs Baseline (within-group comparison) (Catheter-based endovascular sympathetic renal denervation)
Change in office systolic blood pressure at 6 months (-22.0 to -13.1), p=<0.001
p-value: p=<0.001
We did a subject-level meta-analysis of the changes (Δ) in blood pressure (BP) observed 3 and 6 months after renal denervation (RDN) at 10 European centers. Recruited patients (n=109; 46.8% women; mean age 58.2 years) had essential hypertension confirmed by ambulatory BP. From baseline to 6 months, treatment score declined slightly from 4.7 to 4.4 drugs per day. Systolic/diastolic BP fell by 17.6/7.1 mm Hg for office BP, and by 5.9/3.5, 6.2/3.4, and 4.4/2.5 mm Hg for 24-h, daytime and nighttime BP (P0.03 for all). In 47 patients with 3- and 6-month ambulatory measurements, systolic BP did not change between these two time points (P0.08). Normalization was a systolic BP of <140 mm Hg on office measurement or <130 mm Hg on 24-h monitoring and improvement was a fall of 10 mm Hg, irrespective of measurement technique. For office BP, at 6 months, normalization, improvement or no decrease occurred in 22.9, 59.6 and 22.9% of patients, respectively; for 24-h BP, these proportions were 14.7, 31.2 and 34.9%, respectively. Higher baseline BP predicted greater BP fall at follow-up; higher baseline serum creatinine was associated with lower probability of improvement of 24-h BP (odds ratio for 20-μmol l(-1) increase, 0.60; P=0.05) and higher probability of experiencing no BP decrease (OR, 1.66; P=0.01). In conclusion, BP responses to RDN include regression-to-the-mean and remain to be consolidated in randomized trials based on ambulatory BP monitoring. For now, RDN should remain the last resort in patients in whom all other ways to control BP failed, and it must be cautiously used in patients with renal impairment.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Alexandre Persu
Vascular Medicine
Yu Jin
University of Glasgow
Michel Azizi
Vascular Medicine
Journal of Human Hypertension
ENLIGHTEN (Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling Islam)
Université Paris Cité
Karolinska Institutet
KU Leuven
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Persu et al. (Thu,) conducted a meta-analysis in Treatment-resistant essential hypertension (n=109). Renal denervation (RDN) vs. Baseline (within-group comparison) was evaluated on Change in office systolic blood pressure at 6 months (95% CI -22.0 to -13.1, p=<0.001). Renal denervation reduced office systolic blood pressure by 17.6 mm Hg and 24-h ambulatory systolic blood pressure by 5.9 mm Hg at 6 months, though individual responses were highly variable.
synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1235cca4bed3c7b166bf0a — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/jhh.2013.88
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: