Key result
Living in more affluent areas was associated with a substantially lower composite prevalence of 48 chronic conditions (crude prevalence ranging from 0.6 to 72.5 per 100) among low-income older adults.
Why the study?
Although low-income adults in more affluent US areas have longer life expectancies, less is known about the relationship between geographic affluence and morbidity in low-income populations.
Is the economic affluence of a local area associated with the prevalence of chronic conditions among low-income, older adults?
Cross-Sectional (n=6,363,097)
Yes
Is the economic affluence of a local area associated with the prevalence of chronic conditions among low-income, older adults?
Low-income older adults living in more affluent areas of the United States have a substantially lower prevalence of chronic conditions.
Neighborhood affluence may modify chronic disease burden in low-income older adults; leaves open causal mechanisms and intervention targets.
Background: Recent studies have reported that low-income adults living in more affluent areas of the United States have longer life expectancies. Less is known about the relationship between the affluence of a geographic area and morbidity of the low-income population. Objective: To evaluate the association between the prevalence of chronic conditions among low-income, older adults and the economic affluence of a local area. Design: Cross-sectional association study. Setting: Medicare in 2015. Participants: 6 363 097 Medicare beneficiaries aged 66 to 100 years with a history of low-income support under Medicare Part D. Measurements: Adjusted prevalence of 48 chronic conditions was computed for 736 commuting zones (CZs). Factor analysis was used to assess spatial covariation of condition prevalence and to construct a composite condition prevalence index for each CZ. The association between morbidity and area affluence was measured by comparing the average of condition prevalence index across deciles of median CZ house values. Results: The mean age of study participants was 77.7 years (SD, 8.2); 67% were women, and 61% were white. The crude prevalence of 48 chronic conditions ranged from 72.5 per 100 for hypertension to 0.6 per 100 for posttraumatic stress disorder. The prevalence of these 48 chronic conditions was highly spatially correlated. Composite condition prevalence was on average substantially lower in more affluent CZs. Limitation: Low-income status measured on the basis of receipt of Medicare Part D low-income subsidies and not capturing persons not enrolled in Medicare Part D. Conclusion: Low-income, older adults living in more affluent areas of the country are healthier, and areas with poor health in the low-income, older adult population tend to have a high prevalence of most chronic conditions. Primary Funding Source: National Institute on Aging.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Polyakova et al. (2019) conducted a cross-sectional in Chronic conditions (n=6,363,097). Economic affluence of local area vs. Less affluent local areas was evaluated on Composite condition prevalence index of 48 chronic conditions. Living in more affluent areas was associated with a substantially lower composite prevalence of 48 chronic conditions (crude prevalence ranging from 0.6 to 72.5 per 100) among low-income older adults.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: