Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Let <tex xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">X₁,X₂,⋯</tex> be independent identically distributed random variables taking values in a finite set <tex xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">X</tex> and consider the conditional joint distribution of the first m elements of the sample <tex xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">X₁,⋯ , Xₙ</tex> on the condition that <tex xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">X₁=x₁</tex> and the sliding block sample average of a function <tex xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">h(· , ·)</tex> defined on <tex xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">X²</tex> exceeds a threshold <tex xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">α > Eh(X₁, X₂)</tex> . For <tex xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">m</tex> fixed and <tex xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">n → ∞</tex> , this conditional joint distribution is shown to converge m the <tex xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">m</tex> -step joint distribution of a Markov chain started in <tex xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">x₁</tex> which is closest to <tex xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">Xₗ, X₂, ⋯</tex> in Kullback-Leibler information divergence among all Markov chains whose two-dimensional stationary distribution <tex xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">P(· , ·)</tex> satisfies <tex xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">∑ P(x, y)h(x, y)≥ α</tex> , provided some distribution <tex xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">P</tex> on <tex xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">X₂</tex> having equal marginals does satisfy this constraint with strict inequality. Similar conditional limit theorems are obtained when <tex xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">X₁, X₂,⋯</tex> is an arbitrary finite-order Markov chain and more general conditioning is allowed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Csiszár et al. (1987) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: