Key result
Deep learning AI identifies incidental PE on CT scans, with ~61% occurring in oncologic patients.
Why the study?
Incidental pulmonary embolisms can be underdiagnosed and undertreated, and the clinical and radiological significance of cases detected by artificial intelligence needed evaluation.
Does a deep learning AI algorithm detect clinically significant incidental pulmonary embolisms missed on initial radiologist review in patients undergoing contrast-enhanced CT scans?
Observational (n=13,603)
No
Does a deep learning AI algorithm detect clinically significant incidental pulmonary embolisms missed on initial radiologist review in patients undergoing contrast-enhanced CT scans?
AI can effectively detect incidental pulmonary embolisms missed on initial review, though most are clinically silent and require careful clinical correlation to avoid overtreatment.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
AI detection of incidental PE in oncology CTs warrants clinical correlation; leaves open impact on outcomes or overtreatment risk.
Background/Objectives: Incidental pulmonary embolisms (IPEs) may be asymptomatic and radiologists may discover them for unrelated reasons, and they can thereby go underdiagnosed and undertreated. Artificial intelligence (AI) has emerged as a possible aid to radiologists in identifying IPEs. This study aimed to assess the clinical and radiological significance of IPEs that a deep learning AI algorithm detected and correlate them with thrombotic burden, CT morphologic signs of right heart strain, and clinical symptoms. Methods: We retrospectively evaluated 13,603 contrast-enhanced thoracic and abdominal CT scans performed over one year at a tertiary care hospital using a CE- and FDA-cleared AI algorithm. Natural language processing (NLP) tools were used to determine whether IPEs were reported by radiologists. We scored confirmed IPEs using the Mastora, Qanadli, Ghanima, and Kirchner scores, and morphologic indicators of right heart strain and clinical parameters such as symptomatology, administered anticoagulation, and 6-month outcomes were analyzed. Results: AI identified 41 IPE cases, of which 61% occurred in oncologic patients. Most emboli were segmental, with no signs of right heart strain. Only 10% of patients were symptomatic. Thrombotic burden scores were similar between oncologic and non-oncologic groups. Four deaths occurred—all in oncologic patients. One untreated case experienced the recurrence of pulmonary embolism. Despite frequent detection, many IPEs were clinically silent. Conclusions: AI can effectively detect IPEs that are missed on initial review. However, most AI-detected IPEs are clinically silent. Integrating AI findings with morphologic and clinical criteria is crucial to avoid overtreatment and to guide appropriate management.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Abed et al. (2025) conducted an observational in Incidental pulmonary embolisms (n=13,603). Deep learning AI algorithm was evaluated on Detection of incidental pulmonary embolisms and correlation with thrombotic burden, right heart strain, and clinical symptoms. A deep learning AI algorithm identified 41 incidental pulmonary embolisms from 13,603 CT scans, of which 61% were in oncologic patients and only 10% were symptomatic.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: