Compares FABP3 and ABI for predicting PAD outcomes, suggesting FABP3 is more reliable.
Background: Peripheral artery disease (PAD) impacts more than 200 million individuals globally. Despite its prevalence, management remains suboptimal, partly due to the lack of reliable blood-based biomarkers. The ankle–brachial index (ABI), the current gold-standard test for PAD, is limited by inter-operator variability, misinterpretation, and reduced accuracy in patients with diabetes. Fatty acid binding protein 3 (FABP3) has emerged as a potential biomarker for PAD; however, its prognostic performance relative to ABI remains unclear. This study compared FABP3 and ABI for predicting PAD outcomes using statistical and machine learning approaches. Methods: A total of 1001 participants were prospectively recruited, including 644 patients with PAD and 357 without PAD. The primary outcome was 2-year major adverse limb event (MALE), defined as a composite of vascular intervention, major amputation, or acute limb ischemia. At enrollment, plasma FABP3 was quantified using a validated multiplex immunoassay. Kaplan–Meier analysis of MALE-free survival was performed across pre-specified FABP3 tertiles (high [>3.55 ng/mL], moderate [1.55–3.55 ng/mL], and low [<1.55 ng/mL]) and ABI tertiles (severe [<0.40], moderate [0.40–<0.70], and mild [0.70–0.90]), with curve separation assessed using log-rank tests. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards modelling was used to evaluate the independent relationships of FABP3 and ABI with 2-year MALE after adjustment for baseline demographic and clinical covariates. To assess predictive performance for 2-year MALE, an extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) classification model incorporating 10-fold cross-validation was trained using a combination of clinical covariates, plasma FABP3 levels, and ABI. Discriminatory performance was assessed using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Results: The average participant age was 68 years (SD 12), and 34% (n = 340) were women. Mean ABI was 0.75 ± 0.25 and mean FABP3 concentration was 2.97 ± 2.06 ng/mL. Among the 644 participants with PAD, 558 (86.6%) had complete time-to-event data for MALE status, FABP3, and ABI. Over the median follow-up period of 2 years, 140 (25.1%) participants with PAD experienced MALE. Kaplan–Meier analyses demonstrated significant separation in MALE-free survival across FABP3 tertiles (log-rank p < 0.001). At 24 months, MALE-free survival was 100.0% in the FABP3 < 1.55 group, compared with 71.1% in the FABP3 1.55–3.55 group and 67.7% in the FABP3 > 3.55 group. In contrast, ABI severity groups showed less pronounced separation, with 24-month MALE-free survival rates of 80.3% for mild ABI, 73.2% for moderate ABI, and 71.3% for severe ABI, without a statistically significant overall difference (p = 0.170). In adjusted Cox proportional hazards models, FABP3 demonstrated strong prognostic performance for 2-year MALE. A 1 SD increase in log-transformed FABP3 was independently associated with a higher risk of 2-year MALE (HR 1.90, 95% CI 1.60–2.25; p < 0.001), with minimal change after additional adjustment for ABI (HR 1.90, 95% CI 1.60–2.24; p < 0.001). Machine learning analyses similarly favored FABP3 over ABI, with the FABP3-based model achieving an AUC of 0.773 compared to 0.686 for the ABI-based model. Adding ABI to the FABP3 model did not improve discrimination. Conclusions: Circulating plasma levels of FABP3 are strongly associated with PAD outcomes. Specifically, FABP3 demonstrated a stronger and more robust association with 2-year MALE compared to ABI. This study validates the prognostic value of FABP3 for PAD outcomes in comparison to ABI.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Li et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: