PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
December 1, 2017European Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing20 citations

Test–retest reliability and responsiveness to change of clinical tests of physical fitness in patients with acute coronary syndrome included in the SWEDEHEART register

View Full Paper
MHMarie HellmarkMBMaria Bäck

Key Result

Clinical tests of physical fitness, including bicycle ergometer, shoulder-flexion, and heel-lift tests, showed excellent test-retest reliability (ICC 0.84-0.98) in patients with ACS.

Study Design

Type

Observational (n=40)

Multicenter

No

Structured PICO

Are the symptom-limited bicycle ergometer test, dynamic unilateral heel-lift test, and unilateral shoulder-flexion test reliable and responsive to change in patients with acute coronary syndrome?

P
Population
40 patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS), aged < 75 years, mean age 63.8 ± 9.5 years, 5 women, included at a university hospital in Sweden.
I
Intervention
Symptom-limited bicycle ergometer test, dynamic unilateral heel-lift test, and unilateral shoulder-flexion test
O
Outcome
Test-retest reliability (intra-class correlation coefficient [ICC], standard error of measurement [SEM]) and responsiveness to change (minimal detectable change)surrogate

Clinical tests of physical fitness, including the bicycle ergometer, heel-lift, and shoulder-flexion tests, show excellent test-retest reliability in patients with acute coronary syndrome, supporting their use in cardiac rehabilitation evaluation.

Main Result

Effect estimate: ICC 0.98, 0.87, 0.84 (95% CI 0.96-0.99, 0.75-0.93, 0.71-0.91)

Abstract

BACKGROUND: To maximise the benefits obtainable from exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation, an evaluation of physical fitness using reliable, clinically relevant tests is strongly recommended. Recently, objective tests of physical fitness have been implemented in the SWEDEHEART register. The reliability of these tests has, however, not been examined for patients with acute coronary syndrome. AIMS: The aim of this study was to assess the test-retest reliability and responsiveness to change of the symptom-limited bicycle ergometer test, the dynamic unilateral heel-lift test and the unilateral shoulder-flexion test in patients with acute coronary syndrome. METHODS: In a longitudinal study design, a total of 40 patients (mean age 63.8 ± 9.5 years, five women), with ACS, aged < 75 years, were included at a university hospital in Sweden. The intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) with a 95% confidence interval, standard error of measurement (SEM) and responsiveness in terms of the minimal detectable change were calculated. RESULTS: Excellent reliability was found, showing ICC values of 0.98 (0.96-0.99), SEM 4.71 for the bicycle ergometer test, ICC 0.87 (0.75-0.93), SEM 4.62 for the shoulder-flexion test and ICC 0.84 (0.71-0.91), SEM 2.24 for the heel-lift test. The minimal detectable change was 13 W, 13 and 6 repetitions for the bicycle ergometer test, shoulder-flexion and heel-lift tests respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The test-retest reliability of clinical tests evaluating physical fitness in patients with acute coronary syndrome included in the SWEDEHEART register was excellent. This makes the future comparison and evaluation of treatment effects in large unselected clinical populations of acute coronary syndrome possible.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Hellmark et al. (2017) conducted an observational in Acute coronary syndrome (n=40). Clinical tests of physical fitness (bicycle ergometer, heel-lift, shoulder-flexion) was evaluated on Test-retest reliability (intra-class correlation coefficient) and responsiveness to change (ICC 0.98, 0.87, 0.84, 95% CI 0.96-0.99, 0.75-0.93, 0.71-0.91). Clinical tests of physical fitness, including bicycle ergometer, shoulder-flexion, and heel-lift tests, showed excellent test-retest reliability (ICC 0.84-0.98) in patients with ACS.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1240ae41f2b0889a38d08bhttps://doi.org/10.1177/1474515117743978
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper