Key result
Phonoelectrocardiographic measurement of an abnormal electromechanical activation time (EMAT) ≥15 was significantly associated with left ventricular dysfunction (OR 1.38) independent of BNP levels.
Why the study?
Does computerized phonoelectrocardiographic analysis combined with BNP testing accurately diagnose left ventricular dysfunction in adult patients undergoing left heart catheterization?
Population
100 adult patients undergoing left heart catheterization
Comparison
Computerized phonoelectrocardiographic analysis… vs Left ventricular dysfunction defined as the…
Design
Cross-sectional
Authors
Loading...
May support adjunctive EMAT assessment with BNP for LV dysfunction; leaves open prospective validation before clinical adoption.
Cross-Sectional (n=100)
No
Does computerized phonoelectrocardiographic analysis combined with BNP testing accurately diagnose left ventricular dysfunction in adult patients undergoing left heart catheterization?
Effect estimate: OR 1.38 (95% CI 1.13-1.69)
p-value: p=<0.0001
Phonoelectrocardiographic measures of systolic time intervals are highly specific for detecting left ventricular dysfunction and provide diagnostic information independent of BNP.
Moyers et al. (2007) conducted a cross-sectional in Left Ventricular Dysfunction (n=100). Phonoelectrocardiographic systolic time intervals (EMAT) vs. B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) was evaluated on Diagnosis of left ventricular dysfunction (LVEDP > 15 mmHg and LVEF < 50%) using EMAT ≥15 (OR 1.38, 95% CI 1.13-1.69, p=<0.0001). Phonoelectrocardiographic measurement of an abnormal electromechanical activation time (EMAT) ≥15 was significantly associated with left ventricular dysfunction (OR 1.38) independent of BNP levels.