PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 27, 2022Journal of the American Heart Association244 citationsOpen Access

Mortality in Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension in the Modern Era: Early Insights From the Pulmonary Hypertension Association Registry

View Full Paper
KCKevin Y. ChangSDSue DuvalDBDavid B. Badesch

Key Result

Initial combination therapy in treatment-naïve patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension was associated with better 1-year survival (adjusted HR 0.43; 95% CI 0.19-0.95; P=0.037).

Study Design

Type

Cohort (n=935)

Multicenter

Yes

Structured PICO

What is the modern-era mortality rate in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension, and does initial combination therapy improve survival in treatment-naïve patients?

P
Population
935 adult patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) enrolled in the Pulmonary Hypertension Association Registry (PHAR) between September 2015 and September 2020, median age 56, 76% women, 52% ≤6 months from diagnosis.
I
Intervention
Initial combination therapy (evaluated in the treatment-naïve subgroup)
C
Comparator
Initial monotherapy or other strategies (implied, evaluated in the treatment-naïve subgroup)
O
Outcome
Mortality at 1, 2, and 3 yearshard clinical

Mortality in intermediate- and high-risk PAH patients remains high in the modern era, though initial combination therapy in treatment-naïve patients is associated with improved 1-year survival.

Main Result

Effect estimate: adjusted HR 0.43 (95% CI 0.19-0.95)

p-value: p=0.037

Abstract

Background Current mortality data for pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) in the United States are based on registries that enrolled patients prior to 2010. We sought to determine mortality in PAH in the modern era using the PHAR (Pulmonary Hypertension Association Registry). Methods and Results We identified all adult patients with PAH enrolled in the PHAR between September 2015 and September 2020 (N=935). We used Kaplan‐Meier survival analysis and Cox proportional hazards models to assess mortality at 1, 2, and 3 years. Patients were stratified based on disease severity by 3 validated risk scores. In treatment‐naïve patients, we compared survival based on initial treatment strategy. The median age was 56 years (44–68 years), and 76% were women. Of the 935 patients, 483 (52%) were ≤6 months from PAH diagnosis. There were 121 deaths (12.9%) during a median follow‐up time of 489 days (281–812 days). The 1‐, 2‐, and 3‐year mortality was 8% (95% CI, 6%–10%), 16% (95% CI, 13%–19%), and 21% (95% CI, 17%–25%), respectively. When stratified into low‐, intermediate‐, and high‐risk PAH, the mortality at 1, 2, and 3 years was 1%, 4% to 6%, and 7% to 11% for low risk; 7% to 8%, 11% to 16%, and 18% to 20% for intermediate risk; and 12% to 19%, 22% to 38%, and 28% to 55% for high risk, respectively. In treatment‐naïve patients, initial combination therapy was associated with better 1‐year survival (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.43 95% CI, 0.19–0.95; P =0.037). Conclusions Mortality in the intermediate‐ and high‐risk patients with PAH remains unacceptably high in the PHAR, suggesting the importance for early diagnosis, aggressive use of available therapies, and the need for better therapeutics.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Chang et al. (2022) conducted a cohort in Pulmonary arterial hypertension (n=935). Initial combination therapy vs. Other initial treatment strategies was evaluated on 1-year survival (adjusted HR 0.43, 95% CI 0.19-0.95, p=0.037). Initial combination therapy in treatment-naïve patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension was associated with better 1-year survival (adjusted HR 0.43; 95% CI 0.19-0.95; P=0.037).

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1241689b33f06ee260d514https://doi.org/10.1161/jaha.121.024969
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper