Key result
Shock wave catheter ablation markedly reduced myoendothelial injury compared with radiofrequency catheter ablation (4.3% vs. 79.6%, P<0.01) and achieved deep lesions in a pig model.
Why the study?
Does shock wave catheter ablation improve lesion depth and reduce myoendocardial injury compared to radiofrequency catheter ablation in a pig model?
Does shock wave catheter ablation improve lesion depth and reduce myoendocardial injury compared to radiofrequency catheter ablation in a pig model?
A novel shock wave catheter ablation system demonstrates deeper lesion depth, significantly less myoendocardial injury, and accelerated tissue repair compared to traditional radiofrequency ablation in a porcine model.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May reduce endothelial injury in ablation; leaves open clinical translation and human efficacy trials.
Aims: Although the radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) is widely used for the treatment of tachyarrhythmias, it has three fundamental weaknesses as a thermal ablation system, including a limited lesion depth, myoendocardial injury linking to thromboembolism, and prolonged inflammation followed by subsequent recurrences. In order to overcome these limitations, we have been developing a shock wave (SW) catheter ablation (SWCA) system as a novel non-thermal therapy. In the present study, we validated our new SWCA system with increased SW intensity. Methods and results: In a total of 36 pigs, we applied our new SWCA to ventricular muscle in vivo for the following protocols. (i) Epicardial approach (n = 17): The lesion depth achieved by the SWCA from the epicardium was examined. High intensity SW achieved 5.2 ± 0.9 mm lesions (35 applications), where there was a strong correlation between SW intensity and lesion depth (R = 0.80, P < 0.001, 54 applications). (ii) Endocardial approach (n = 6): The extent of endocardial injury with the two energy sources was examined by electron microscopy (8 applications each). Shock wave catheter ablation markedly reduced myoendothelial injury compared with RFCA (4.3 ± 1.2 vs. 79.6 ± 4.8%, P < 0.01). The electrophysiological effects on the SW lesions were also confirmed using three-dimensional mapping system. (iii) Time-course study (n = 6 each): The healing process after ablation therapy was examined. We found transient inflammatory responses and accelerated reparative process with preserved blood flow in the SWCA group. Conclusion: These results indicate that our SWCA system is characterized, as compared with RFCA, by deeper lesion depth, markedly less myoendocardial injury and accelerated tissue repair process.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hirano et al. (2017) studied Tachyarrhythmias (n=36). Shock wave catheter ablation (SWCA) vs. Radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) was evaluated on Extent of myoendothelial injury (p=<0.01). Shock wave catheter ablation markedly reduced myoendothelial injury compared with radiofrequency catheter ablation (4.3% vs. 79.6%, P<0.01) and achieved deep lesions in a pig model.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: