This paper proposes a framework for evaluating the doctoral curriculum. Noting that much previous research and evaluation in doctoral education have focused on the outputs of the degree or the supervisory process, the paper identifies the content of the training students receive in particular fields of study, the doctoral curriculum, as in need of further scrutiny. Based on concepts from curriculum evaluation, a framework is proposed to identify the research questions and data sources which might guide such a study.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rob Gilbert (2004) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: