The effects of different forms of resistant potato starch (RS) on the major microbial population groups and short-chain fatty acids (SCFA) in the cecum and feces of rats were studied over a 5-mo feeding period. Thirty 8-wk-old male Wistar rats, averaging 210 g initial body weight, were adapted for 7 d to a balanced basal diet containing 60% waxy maize starch devoid of any RS. On d 8, three groups of 10 rats each were fed diets containing the following forms of starch: 1) rapidly digestible waxy maize starch (basal diet), 2) a mixture of 83.3% waxy maize starch and 16.7% native granular potato starch (RS 1), or 3) a mixture of 33.3% waxy maize starch and 66.7% modified potato starch (RS 2). The final RS content in RS 1 and RS 2 was 10%. Fecal samples were collected at d 8 and 1, 3, and 5 mo after the start of the experiment. Cecal contents were taken after 5 mo. The colony counts of microbial groups did not vary with time in the control or the RS 1 group (P > .05). Only the number of Bacteroides/fusobacteria decreased between mo 1 and 5 in rats fed RS 1 (P < .05). The RS 2 diet led to a significant increase in total culturable bacteria, lactobacilli, streptococci, and enterobacteria between mo 1 and 5. The RS 1 and RS 2 diets stimulated the growth of bifidobacteria. Cecal numbers of lactobacilli, streptococci, and enterobacteria were higher in rats fed RS 2 than in rats fed RS 1 or control diet (P < .05). Lactobacillus cellobiosus occurred only in rats fed RS 1 or RS 2. Acetate increased in mo 3 compared with d 8 in all groups (P < .05). The fecal and cecal SCFA displayed higher concentrations of acetate and propionate and a higher molar proportion of propionate in RS 2 than in RS 1 or control rats (P < .05). Stimulation of bifidobacteria, lactobacilli, and SCFA may be useful for the suppression of pathogenic organisms in the colon.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kleessen et al. (1997) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: