Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This article takes stock of one aspect of psychologically based empirical jurisprudence-its role in legal change over the last decade. It assesses the ways in which the increased involvement of psychology in the legal process has influenced and affected the nature and direction of legal change. While acknowledging very real and tangible successes, it also identifies several problem areas, ones whose significance may grow in light of an increasingly unsympathetic, conservative judiciary. The direction of psychology and law, as an applied academic discipline, and the future of empirically based legal change are also examined.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Craig Haney (1993) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: