Previous work on the long-term effects of early reading focuses on whether children can read early (i.e. capability) not on whether this is beneficial (i.e. optimality).The Luke Effect is introduced to predict long-term reading development as a function of when children learn to read. A review of correlational, intervention, and comparative research suggests that early reading shows only short-term effects for reading skills that later wash out. Based on different developmental trajectories of language and word recognition skills (WRS), it is hypothesised that: (1) children who learn to read later acquire WRS more readily; and (2) acquiring WRS earlier does not improve language development. Thus, reading instruction falling ‘on good soil [produces] a hundred times as much grain' (Luke, 8:8), but early reading skills do not improve the soil, simply withering until children's language is more developed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sebastian Suggate (2015) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: