Why the study?
Does the VMS safety programme reduce the incidence of surgical site infections in patients undergoing gastrointestinal surgery?
Cross-Sectional
Does the VMS safety programme reduce the incidence of surgical site infections in patients undergoing gastrointestinal surgery?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Cross-sectional data leave VMS programme effect on post-GI surgery SSI rates undetermined; prospective trials required.
A surgical site infection (SSI) is a serious and costly complication with the highest rates being reported after gastrointestinal surgery. The objective of this cross sectional study was to assess the incidence and risk factors of SSI after gastrointestinal surgery during and after hospitalization, and to evaluate the effect of the VMS (Dutch: "VeiligheidsManagementSysteem") safety programme on the SSI rate. We assessed the SSI rate from July 2008 until December 2011, according to the criteria of the Centres for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), before and after implementation of the VMS safety programme which includes a bundle of four interventions. We differentiated between the SSI rate during and after hospitalization and between superficial, deep and organ/ space infections. The incidence of SSI in relation to the wound class, risk factors for SSI, and the compliance with the programme were assessed. Data were obtained during a thirty-day follow-up period after surgery.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ramcharan et al. (2014) conducted a cross-sectional in Surgical site infections after gastrointestinal surgery. VMS safety programme vs. Before implementation of the VMS safety programme was evaluated on Incidence of surgical site infection (SSI).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: