Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Several 2-D architectures have been presented, including systolic arrays or compute-in-memory (CIM) arrays for energy-efficient artificial intelligence (AI) inference. To increase the energy efficiency within constrained area, 3-D technologies have been actively investigated, which have the potential to decrease the data path length or increase the activation buffer size, enabling higher energy efficiency. Several works have reported the 3-D architectures using non-CIM designs, but investigations on 3-D architectures with CIM macros have not been well studied in prior works. In this article, we investigate digital CIM (DCIM) macros and various 3-D architectures to find the opportunity of increased energy efficiency compared with 2-D structures. Moreover, we also investigated the carbon footprint of 3-D architectures. We have built in-house simulators calculating energy and area given high-level hardware descriptions and DNN workloads and integrated with carbon estimation tool to analyze the embodied carbon of various hardware designs. We have investigated different types of 3-D DCIM architectures and dataflows, which have shown 42.5% energy savings compared with 2-D systolic arrays on average. Also, we have analyzed the tradeoff between performance and carbon footprint and their optimization opportunities.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Byun et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: