Key result
Quality improvement initiative featuring automated referrals boosts post-ACS cardiac rehabilitation referrals to ~43%.
Why the study?
Despite class 1 recommendations, only 1 in 5 ACS patients are referred for cardiac rehabilitation nationally, and even fewer at the authors' institution.
Does a quality improvement initiative including education, automated referrals, and multidisciplinary rounds improve cardiac rehabilitation referral and attendance rates in post-ACS patients?
Does a quality improvement initiative including education, automated referrals, and multidisciplinary rounds improve cardiac rehabilitation referral and attendance rates in post-ACS patients?
A quality improvement initiative utilizing education, automated referrals, and multidisciplinary rounds significantly increased cardiac rehabilitation referrals and attendance in post-ACS patients.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May support QI programs to boost post-ACS referrals; leaves open need for RCTs on attendance and outcomes.
Cardiac rehabilitation is a class 1 recommendation for acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients according to the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association. However, only 1 in 5 ACS patients are referred for cardiac rehabilitation nationally, and even fewer at our institution. We sought to improve the number of referrals to cardiac rehabilitation for post-ACS patients admitted to our inpatient cardiology service, and ultimately their participation in the program. We designed a quality improvement initiative that included education of patients and house staff, automated referral order, and participation of cardiac rehabilitation staff members on multidisciplinary rounds. We compared the number of patients who received a referral to cardiac rehabilitation, had the first appointment scheduled before hospital discharge, and attended the program before and after our intervention. Six months after initiation of the project, the proportion of ACS patients referred to cardiac rehabilitation before hospital discharge increased from 10% to 43% (P < 0.001). The mean number of patients with a cardiac rehabilitation appointment scheduled before discharge was 2 before and 5 after the intervention (P < 0.001), and the mean number of patients who attended their scheduled appointment was 1 before and 3 after the intervention (P = 0.001). Run charts demonstrated that the number of referrals and the number of scheduled appointments remained above the median following the intervention. In conclusion, an initiative that included education, automated referrals, and direct one-on-one contact with cardiac rehabilitation staff before discharge increased the number of cardiac rehabilitation referrals, and appointments scheduled and attended in post-ACS patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Matthia et al. (2021) studied Acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Quality improvement initiative (education, automated referral, multidisciplinary rounds) vs. Pre-intervention standard care was evaluated on Proportion of ACS patients referred to cardiac rehabilitation before hospital discharge (p=<0.001). A quality improvement initiative including education, automated referrals, and multidisciplinary rounds increased cardiac rehabilitation referrals in post-ACS patients from 10% to 43% (P<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: