Los puntos clave no están disponibles para este artículo en este momento.
Two experiments investigated the judgmental and behavioral consequences of priming a social cate-gory. In the first experiment, assimilation and contrast effects of judgment of a target persons hostil-ity obtained following priming with exemplars of, respectively, moderate and extreme levels of the category hostility. The second experiment replicated these findings and, in addition, demonstrated that subjects then behaved consistently with their evaluations of the target person in a social interac-tion. The results are discussed in terms of the social interaction literature, with category accessibility serving as a means of creating an expectancy for the targets behavior. A considerable amount of research evidence supports the no-tion that the expectations held by an individual regarding the behavior of a target person determine, to a great extent, the con-tent of the social interaction between the two individuals. In game settings, subjects who thought that their partner disliked them (Jones Panitch, 1971) or who were led to believe that their partner was a generally hostile person (Snyder Swann, 1978) behaved significantly more competitively toward that
Paul M. Herr (Mon,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: