This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
There are no established prognostic tools for predicting relapse risk in first-episode bipolar disorder (FEBD), limiting the use of personalized treatment approaches. We aimed to develop and validate a machine learning (ML) model to predict relapse in FEBD patients and assess whether pharmacotherapy effectiveness varies across predicted risk strata. We used nationwide registry data from Sweden (n = 30,402; follow-up = 2006-2021) and Finland (n = 13,790; follow-up = 1996-2018). The developed ML model achieved an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) of 0.71 (95% CI = 0.69-0.72, highest for relapse due to psychotic mania [AUROC = 0.85, 95% CI = 0.80-0.89]) in the Swedish cohort (internal validation) and 0.68 (95% CI = 0.66-0.69, highest for nonpsychotic mania [AUROC = 0.74, 95% CI = 0.69-0.78]) in the Finnish cohort (external validation). The model incorporated only seven accessible predictors, including pharmacotherapies during the first 30 days post-FEBD (lithium, combination treatments, and antipsychotics), outpatient follow-up within 30 days post-FEBD, prolonged initial hospitalization for FEBD, history of prior psychiatric hospitalizations, and sickness absence days. Among high-risk patients (N = 10,119, 31.77%), long-acting injectable (LAI) antipsychotics were associated with the greatest reduction in psychiatric rehospitalization risk (HR = 0.44, 95% CI 0.29-0.67). In the low-risk group (n = 21,736, 68.23%), only combinations of quetiapine with valproate (HR = 0.79, 95% CI = 0.65-0.95) or lamotrigine (HR = 0.86, 95% CI = 0.74-0.99) were associated with reduced rehospitalization risk. Available online for research purposes, our internally and externally validated prognostic model may inform clinical decision-making by identifying high-risk individuals who could benefit from early initiation of LAI antipsychotics, promoting a shift toward proactive, risk-guided treatment in FEBD patients.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lieslehto et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: