Key result
Vitamin K antagonist therapy in atrial fibrillation carries a risk of bleeding complications, which can be assessed using predictive models and managed with corrective treatments.
Why the study?
What are the risk factors, epidemiology, and management strategies for bleeding complications associated with vitamin K antagonists in patients with atrial fibrillation?
What are the risk factors, epidemiology, and management strategies for bleeding complications associated with vitamin K antagonists in patients with atrial fibrillation?
This review summarizes the epidemiology, risk factors, and management of bleeding complications associated with vitamin K antagonist therapy in patients with atrial fibrillation.
Supports bleeding risk stratification with VKAs in AF; leaves open updated models versus DOACs.
The fear of bleeding complications is a common reason for withholding effective prophylaxis with vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) against thromboembolism. This article reviews the epidemiology of bleeding complications with VKAs, with particular emphasis on studies in patients with atrial fibrillation. Risk factors for bleeding, which can be divided into those related to excessive anticoagulant effect and/or those related to increased patient susceptibility, are discussed. The strongest risk factors can be built into models for predicting bleeding during anticoagulant therapy, and two such models that have been published are described. Finally, effective corrective treatment of excessive anticoagulation and bleeding episodes, that are crucial for the outcome and different modalities, are also reviewed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Schulman et al. (2005) conducted a review in Atrial fibrillation. Vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) was evaluated on Bleeding complications. Vitamin K antagonist therapy in atrial fibrillation carries a risk of bleeding complications, which can be assessed using predictive models and managed with corrective treatments.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: