PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
December 5, 2017Journal of Political Economy369 citations

How Much Do Idiosyncratic Bank Shocks Affect Investment? Evidence from Matched Bank-Firm Loan Data

View Full Paper
MAMary AmitiDWDavid E. Weinstein

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

We show that supply-side financial shocks have a large impact on firms’ investment. We develop a new methodology to separate firm borrowing shocks from bank supply shocks using a vast sample of matched bank-firm lending data. We decompose aggregate loan movements in Japan for the period 1990–2010 into bank, firm, industry, and common shocks. The high degree of financial institution concentration means that individual banks are large relative to the size of the economy, which creates a role for granular shocks as in Gabaix’s (2011) study. We show that idiosyncratic granular bank supply shocks explain 30–40 percent of aggregate loan and investment fluctuations.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Amiti et al. (2017) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a126df3f7bd4f5c7da64e1dhttps://doi.org/10.1086/696272
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Consolidation and efficiency in the financial sector: A review of the international evidence2004 · 536 citations
  2. 2The Granular Origins of Aggregate Fluctuations2011 · 1,364 citations
  3. 3Are There Bank Effects in Borrowers' Costs of Funds? Evidence from a Matched Sample of Borrowers and Banks2002 · 330 citations
  4. 4New Evidence on the Lending Channel2006 · 433 citations
  5. 5The effectiveness of bank recapitalization policies in Japan2007 · 53 citations