Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Tests fluency attribution in persuasion by familiar spokespersons, suggesting implications for influence strategies.
Familiar people are especially persuasive spokespersons. Here, a fluency attribution model of spokesperson familiarity was tested. Specifically, it was hypothesized that repeated exposure to a spokesperson would create fluency that, in a persuasive context, could be attributed to the persuasive message or to another fluency‐relevant cue (e.g., the fame of the spokesperson). In three experiments a woman's photo was repeatedly presented, and subsequently accompanied a persuasive message. Consistent with hypotheses, inflated ratings of the message followed repeated spokesperson exposure (compared to a no exposure control) but only when inflated ratings of the spokesperson (fame) or her photo (perceptual clarity) were not observed. Discussion focuses on implications for familiarity theories and on guidelines for maximizing the influence of familiar spokespersons.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Weisbuch et al. (2009) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: