Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
We discuss the problem arising from the nonuniform distribution of spectral transmittance of the instrument's shielding dome. Recently, by using high-resolution atmospheric radiation software, itbecame possible to evaluate both the real downward IR spectral flux density and the transmitted spectral flux density of the instrument's dome. By using a simplified model we obtained a theoretical formula that describes the effect of dome transmittance on the instrument's response. By the formula, the effective dome transmittance (average dome transmittance weighted by the spectral flux density) is directly proportional to the calibration constant of the instrument. In order to obtain a quantitative relationship we computed the effective dome transmittance for several domes and model atmospheres. ccording to our results the maximum difference in effective dome transmittance of individual domes is 20% for Eppley-type silicon domes and 10% for polyethylene domes. These relatively large differencesmust be corrected when the domes are replaced. The effective dome transmittance shows strongcorrelation with precipitable water and the total downward IR flux density. The combined effect on thecalibration factor is a maximum 2% for the Eppley domes and 5% for the polyethylene domes. By usingthe linear regression method these types of error can be minimized.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Miskolczi et al. (1993) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: