PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
August 25, 2020Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education28 citations

Investigating the relationship between career development and productivity with the mediating role of self-regulation among university staff

View Full Paper
SDSamira DelbariRSRajaipour SaeedYAYasamin Abedini

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Purpose The present study aimed to investigate the relationship between career development and productivity of the university staff with the mediating role of self-regulation. Design/methodology/approach The research approach is quantitative-relational and is based on structural equation modeling (SEM). The population consisted of the staff of two Iranian universities in 2018 out of which 331 participants were selected using Cochran's formula and a proportionate stratified random sampling method. To gather data, the self-regulation questionnaire (SRQ), the career development questionnaire (CDQ) and a researcher-made employees' productivity questionnaire (EPQ) were used. In terms of reliability, Cronbach's alpha coefficient of the instruments was found to be 0.97, 0.84 and 0.88, respectively. Face and content validity were confirmed by a group of field experts. Findings The findings indicated that the staff’s self-regulation had a positive and significant effect on individual, organizational and environmental productivity factors. In addition, self-regulation had the ability to predict those factors. It was found that self-regulation had a mediating role in the relationship between career development and staff productivity. According to the results, educational institutions, especially universities, can provide their staff with the opportunity to exploit their full potentials through reinforcing their self-regulation and increasing their productivity. Research limitations/implications Higher self-regulation capacity among university staff helps them liberate their potential energy for disinterested selfless service to the society. Higher self-regulation capacities allow individuals to increase the energy resource for self-regulation and contribute to the productivity and quality of life. The statistical population of the quantitative section is confined only to the staff working at Iranian universities. Therefore, our results should be cautiously generalized to universities in other countries. Practical implications Our findings can help in empowering human resources and consequently improving education and research processes. Social implications Universities play a decisive role in the economic growth and development of countries because of their diverse services in the production and distribution of science and knowledge. Originality/value This study was conducted on university’s staff productivity, while most previous researches have been conducted in industrial enterprises. Thus, the present study seeks to fill this research gap by means of providing new perspectives and information on the factors affecting staff productivity and the relationship between research variables in higher education institutions.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Delbari et al. (2020) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1274158793652519a61286https://doi.org/10.1108/jarhe-06-2019-0153
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1The Role of Subjective Well-Being in Positive Youth Development2004 · 769 citations
  2. 2Self‐regulation: a strategic alternative for small firms?2011 · 17 citations
  3. 3Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error1981 · 61,272 citations
  4. 4The construct validity of Schein's career anchors orientation inventory2008 · 82 citations
  5. 5Leadership mentoring in nursing research, career development and scholarly productivity: A systematic review2017 · 132 citations