Key result
Racial disparities in high-quality hospital use showed a white-black gap of 1.7 percentage points for AMI and 7.5 percentage points for CABG, largely driven by nongeographic factors within regions.
Why the study?
Black-white gaps in high-quality hospital use are documented, but the relative contributions of geographic and nongeographic factors to this gap remain unclear.
Observational
Yes
Nongeographic factors are the primary drivers of within-region racial disparities in the use of high-quality hospitals for AMI and CABG.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Nongeographic factors may drive within-region racial disparities in high-quality AMI and CABG care; leaves open targeted intervention effects.
BACKGROUND: Black-white gaps in high-quality hospital use are documented, but the relative contributions of various factors are unclear. The objective of this study was to quantify the contributions of differences in geographic and nongeographic factors to the gap, using decomposition methods and data for coronary heart disease. RESEARCH DESIGN: We identified white and black fee-for-service beneficiaries aged 65 or older who were hospitalized for acute myocardial infarction (AMI) or coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) surgery during 2009-2011. We categorized hospitals with AMI mortality rates in the lowest quintile as high-quality hospitals. We first decomposed the white-black gap in high-quality hospital use into a component due to racial differences in region of residence and a within-region component. We then decomposed the within-region differences into contributions due to racial differences in geographic proximity to high-quality hospitals and due to nongeographic factors. RESULTS: The white-black gap in high-quality hospital use was smaller for AMI than for CABG (1.7 percentage points vs. 7.5 percentage points). For AMI, region of residence contributed more to the gap than within-region differences (1.0 percentage point vs. 0.6 percentage points), while for CABG, within-region differences prevailed (2.0 percentage points vs. 5.4 percentage points). For both conditions, the within-region white-black difference in high-quality hospital use was mainly driven by nongeographic factors. CONCLUSIONS: Decomposition methods are a useful tool in quantifying the contributions of various factors to the white-black gap in high-quality hospital use and could inform local policy aimed at reducing disparities in hospital quality.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Huckfeldt et al. (2019) conducted an observational in Acute myocardial infarction (AMI) or coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). Geographic and nongeographic factors was evaluated on White-black gap in high-quality hospital use. Racial disparities in high-quality hospital use showed a white-black gap of 1.7 percentage points for AMI and 7.5 percentage points for CABG, largely driven by nongeographic factors within regions.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: