AbstractEducation for sustainability refers to educational policies that focus on shaping a sustainable future. Mobile learning software refers to the use of mobile applications through smart devices for promoting online learning. However, the effectiveness of such software in learning for sustainability depends on users' intention to adopt it. While there is growing interest in using mobile technology for sustainability education, empirical evidence on how personalized mobile software can influence users' attitudes and behaviors toward sustainable practices is limited. Thus, this study investigates the factors that affect users' acceptance of mobile learning technology in sustainability education, by integrating environmental awareness and personalization strategies into a modified model based on the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology (UTAUT). A total of 120 users participated in the survey. An empirical analysis of data was conducted using Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) to test the relationship between the variables of the model. The results showed that both environmental awareness and personalization strategies had a significant effect on users' behavioral intentions. In addition, hedonic motivation and habit exerted an effect on behavioral intention, contrary to effort expectancy and social influence. These findings confirm that a personalized mobile learning application related to environmental issues reveals as a powerful tool for supporting environmental education since such software appears to have high acceptance by the user. The significance of the study lies in its potential to inform the design and development of personalized mobile applications for sustainability education. The study contributes to the creation of more effective mobile applications that promote sustainable behavior and contribute to a more sustainable future by identifying the elements that influence user acceptance.Keywords: Acceptance modelenvironmental awarenessmobile softwaresustainable learningTAMUTAUT Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Additional informationFundingThis research received no external funding.Notes on contributorsAkrivi KrouskaAkrivi Krouska is a Postdoctoral Researcher in the Department of Informatics and Computer Engineering, University of West Attica, Greece. She has published a significant number of articles in international conferences, books, and journals. Her research interests include social networking services, learning analytics, user modeling, and artificial intelligence in education.Christos TroussasChristos Troussas is Assistant Professor in the Department of Informatics and Computer Engineering, University of West Attica, Greece. He has published a significant number of articles in international conferences, books, and journals. His current research interests include personalized software engineering, HCI, human-centered artificial intelligence.Katerina KabassiKaterina Kabassi is Professor in the Department of Environment, Ionian University, Greece. She has published a significant number of articles in international conferences, books, and journals. Her current research interests include personalized software engineering, human-computer interaction and user modeling.Cleo SgouropoulouCleo Sgouropoulou is a Professor in the Department of Informatics and Computer Engineering, University of West Attica, Greece. She has published a significant number of articles in international conferences, books, and journals. Her research interests include software engineering, artificial intelligence in education, user modeling, and quality assurance in education.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Krouska et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: