Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Objective: To compare the efficacy and safety of robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RARP) performed using the KangDuo surgical robot system to the da Vinci Si robotic system in clinically localized prostate cancer (KD-RARP vs DV-RARP). Methods: A total of 16 patients underwent extraperitoneal KD-RARP performed by a single experienced surgeon using the KangDuo surgical robot system between May 2021 and August 2021. The data were prospectively collected. The most recent 16 cases of extraperitoneal DV-RARP performed in 2021 by the same surgeon were selected from a prospectively maintained database for comparison to prevent operator variability. Preoperative, perioperative, and postoperative data were collected and compared between the two groups. Results: No significant difference was noted between the two groups in terms of basic clinical characteristics. All operations were performed successfully without open or traditional laparoscopic conversion. KD-RARP had a significantly longer operation time compared with DV-RARP (127 107–159 vs 70.5 54–90 minutes, p < 0.001). No significant differences between the two groups were observed in neurovascular bundle sparing, estimated blood loss, postoperative hospital stay duration, complications, positive surgical margins, biochemical recurrence, and continence recovery 3 months after catheter removal. Conclusions: RARP using the KangDuo surgical robot system achieved similar short-term oncological and functional outcomes with a disadvantage in operation time compared with the da Vinci Si robotic system. A multicenter randomized clinical trial with a larger sample size is needed for more experience.
Fan et al. (Thu,) studied this question.