PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
December 1, 2004The American Journal of Sports Medicine396 citations

Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Autograft Choice: Bone-Tendon-Bone versus Hamstring

View Full Paper
KSKurt P. SpindlerJKJohn E. KuhnKFKevin B. Freedman

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Anterior cruciate ligament graft choice is controversial, with no evidence-based consensus available to guide decision making. The study design was evidence-based medicine systematic review of randomized controlled trials evaluating patellar tendon versus hamstring tendon autografts. A literature review identified 9 randomized controlled trials comparing patellar tendon and hamstring tendon autografts. An evidence-based systematic review was performed. Objective and subjective outcomes of interest included surgical technique, rehabilitation, instrumented laxity, isokinetic strength, patellofemoral pain, return to preinjury activity, and Tegner, Lysholm, Cincinnati, and International Knee Documentation Committee-1991 scores. Additional surgery, graft failure, and complications were reviewed. Slight increased laxity on arthrometer testing was seen in the hamstring population in 3 of 7 studies. Pain with kneeling was greater for the patellar tendon population in 4 of 4 studies. Only 1 of 9 studies showed increased anterior knee pain in the patellar tendon group. Frequency of additional surgery seemed to be related to the fixation method and not graft type. No study reported a significant difference in graft failure between patellar tendon and hamstring tendon autografts. Objective differences (range of motion, isokinetic strength, arthrometer testing) were not detected between groups in the majority of studies, suggesting that their sensitivity to detect clinical outcomes may be limited. Increased kneeling pain in the patellar tendon group was seen consistently in the studies evaluated. Subjective differences in anterior knee pain or return-to-activity level were not consistently observed in these studies. With numbers available, failure rates were not significantly different between groups. These findings suggest that graft type may not be the primary determinant for successful outcomes after anterior cruciate ligament surgery.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Spindler et al. (2004) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a127bc38793652519a61cd9https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546504271211
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1How to report statistics in medicine: annotated guidelines for authors, editors, and reviewers1997 · 309 citations
  2. 2The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection.1992 · 34,020 citations
  3. 3A Prospective Randomized Study of Patellar versus Hamstring Tendon Autografts for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction2003 · 273 citations
  4. 4ANTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENT REPLACEMENT: COMPARISON OF BONE-PATELLAR TENDON-BONE GRAFTS WITH TWO-STRAND HAMSTRING GRAFTS2002 · 409 citations
  5. 5Patellar Tendon or Semitendinosus Tendon Autografts for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction?2003 · 337 citations