PURPOSE: The effects of metabolic syndrome on bladder function and M2,3-muscarinic receptor expression were studied using the fructose fed obese rat. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Male Wistar rats were divided into 2 groups, including group 1-normal control rats and group 2-6-week fructose fed rats. In vivo cystometry using anesthesia was performed. In vitro the bladder was divided into the urothelium and muscle layer by microdissection. Tissue M2,3-muscarinic receptor protein levels were measured by Western blotting. Expression of the mRNAs that encode M2,3-muscarinic receptors was estimated using reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction. RESULTS: Premicturition unstable bladder contractions suggestive of detrusor overactivity were noted in 62.5% of fructose fed rats but in no controls. M2,3-muscarinic receptor protein and mRNA expression was noted in the urothelium and muscle layer of the rat bladder. In control rats the M2-to-M3-muscarinic receptor protein expression ratio was 1:0.68 in urothelium and 1:0.28 in the muscle layer, and that for mRNA expression was 1:0.32 and 1:0.36, respectively. Compared to controls bladder M2,3-muscarinic receptor protein expression in the urothelium and muscle layer of 8 preparations each was significantly increased in fructose fed rats by 89% and 90% for M2-muscarinic receptor (each p <0.001), and by 35% and 93% for M3-muscarinic receptor (p <0.01 and <0.001, respectively). Correspondingly M2,3-muscarinic receptor mRNA expression in the fructose fed rat bladder urothelium and muscle layer of 8 preparations each was also significantly increased by 31% and 49% for M2-muscarinic receptor (each p <0.01), and by 121% and 117% for M3-muscarinic receptor (each p <0.001, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Metabolic syndrome induces increased expression of M2,3-muscarinic receptor mRNA and protein in the urothelium as well as the muscle layer of the bladder in 6-week fructose fed rats. The receptor alterations are associated with functional evidence of detrusor overactivity.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tong et al. (2007) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: