Key result
Only ~19% of surveyed Chinese anesthesiologists routinely implement lung-protective ventilation bundles.
Why the study?
Current clinical practice regarding intraoperative ventilation management in non-cardiothoracic surgery among anesthesia providers in China is unclear.
What is the current clinical practice regarding intraoperative ventilation management in non-cardiothoracic surgery among anesthesiologists in China?
Cross-Sectional (n=1,089)
Yes
What is the current clinical practice regarding intraoperative ventilation management in non-cardiothoracic surgery among anesthesiologists in China?
There is significant heterogeneity in intraoperative ventilation management during non-cardiothoracic surgery among Chinese anesthesiologists, with only 20% routinely implementing full lung-protective ventilation bundles.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Highlights incomplete bundle adoption in China; leaves open the need for education and outcome trials.
Background The current clinical practice regarding intraoperative ventilation management in non-cardiothoracic surgical setting among anesthesia providers in China is unclear. Methods We developed a 25-question anonymous survey which was distributed to anesthesia departments from 81 tertiary/university hospitals in China between August 2021 and September 2021. Information including participant characteristics, ventilatory settings, and opinions on lung-protective ventilation were obtained by electronic survey. Results were reported descriptively. Results The survey was completed by 1089 anesthesiologists from 57 institutions (70% institution response rate). The vast majority of respondents (1010/1089; 92.7%)used low tidal volume (6–8 ml kg − 1 ) ventilation. About three quarters (840/1089; 77.1%) utilized positive end-expiratory pressure, and most anesthesiologists set positive end-expiratory pressure of 1–5 cmH 2 O in either laparoscopic (639/840; 76.1%) or non-laparoscopic surgery (736/840; 87.6%). The majority of respondents (921/1089; 84.6%) performed alveolar recruitment maneuver intraoperatively. Approximate 20% of respondents routinely implemented lung-protective ventilation with bundles of low tidal volume, positive end-expiratory pressure, and alveolar recruitment maneuver. Conclusions We found that heterogeneity exists between individual practices regarding intraoperative ventilation management in the setting of non-cardiothoracic surgery, indicating the potential knowledge-practice gap among Chinese anesthesiologists. Trial registration number: ChiCTR2100047653; Registration date : June 21, 2021 Registry URL : Chictr.org.cn.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rao et al. (2022) conducted a cross-sectional in Intraoperative ventilation management in non-cardiothoracic surgery (n=1,089). Lung-protective ventilation (survey) was evaluated on Routine implementation of lung-protective ventilation bundles (low tidal volume, PEEP, and alveolar recruitment maneuver). In a national survey of 1089 Chinese anesthesiologists, only 19.1% routinely implemented lung-protective ventilation bundles consisting of low tidal volume, positive end-expiratory pressure, and alveolar recruitment maneuvers.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: