Key result
Family history-based digital CV risk tools face significant legal and ethical challenges under EU regulations.
Why the study?
Developing a digital risk-prediction tool for the general population to evaluate cardiovascular risk from family health history faces potential legal and ethical challenges.
The development of digital cardiovascular risk-prediction tools using family health history faces significant legal and ethical challenges under EU regulations, necessitating the involvement of legal and ethical experts.
Necessitates early legal-ethics input for EU tool development; leaves open feasible compliance pathways for family history-based prediction.
UNSTRUCTURED Cardiovascular diseases, both inherited and familial, indicate a risk of early and preventable cardiovascular events for relatives of affected individuals. A digital risk-prediction tool that enables general population individuals to evaluate their cardiovascular risk based on family health history could be a responsible approach to facilitate early detection and improve public health, but development and use of such a tool is not without legal and ethical challenges. At the start of tool development, experts mapped it’s legal and ethical framework and concluded that especially European Union (EU) regulations present potential obstacles for its development, broader availability and general use. A first example is that the EU General Data Protection Regulation does not allow the tool to collect health data about relatives without their consent; the alternative is data anonymisation. This requirement has major consequences for the tool’s usefulness and raises ethical concerns about who ‘’the owner’’ is of family data. A second example is related to the EU’s Medical Device Regulation: if software generates health risks or provides medical advice, it requires a CE mark from a ‘notified body’, an extensive and costly procedure. In this article, we describe these challenges in more detail and discuss possible solutions. In conclusion, alongside national law, European law can impact on the development of digital tools that collect family health data to provide information on health risks. We recommend including experts in law and ethics in developmental stages of such tools which are likely to become more frequent in routine public care.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dijkstra et al. (2023) conducted a review in Cardiovascular diseases. Digital risk-prediction tool based on family health history was evaluated. Developing a digital cardiovascular risk-prediction tool based on family health history faces significant legal and ethical challenges under EU regulations, such as GDPR and Medical Device Regulation.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: