Why the study?
Does maintenance of sinus rhythm improve outcomes compared to rate control in appropriate patients with atrial fibrillation?
Does maintenance of sinus rhythm improve outcomes compared to rate control in appropriate patients with atrial fibrillation?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This perspective highlights the continued importance of rhythm control strategies in specific subgroups of patients with atrial fibrillation.
Recent studies have indicated that outcomes in patients with atrial fibrillation who are managed with rate control and anticoagulation are similar to those in patients who have maintenance of sinus rhythm. These studies did not include important groups of patients with atrial fibrillation in whom antiarrhythmic therapy may be appropriate. This perspective argues for the maintenance of sinus rhythm and for the use of antiarrhythmic therapy that includes medications, invasive procedures, and a combination of both in appropriate patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zimetbaum et al. (2004) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: