Key result
BOSS-GAP score moderately improves sleep-disordered breathing detection in AF vs STOP-Bang, yielding ~0.74 AUROC.
Why the study?
Sleep-disordered breathing is prevalent in patients referred for AF catheter ablation, but it remains unclear how to improve pre-selection for screening in this population.
Does the AF-specific BOSS-GAP score improve the detection of moderate-to-severe sleep-disordered breathing compared to the standard STOP-Bang questionnaire in patients referred for AF catheter ablation?
Cohort (n=206)
Yes
Does the AF-specific BOSS-GAP score improve the detection of moderate-to-severe sleep-disordered breathing compared to the standard STOP-Bang questionnaire in patients referred for AF catheter ablation?
An AF-specific refinement of the STOP-Bang questionnaire (the BOSS-GAP score) moderately improves the screening accuracy for moderate-to-severe sleep-disordered breathing in patients referred for AF catheter ablation.
May aid SDB screening in AF ablation referrals; leaves open prospective validation before clinical adoption.
Background Sleep-disordered breathing (SDB) is prevalent in up to 50% of patients referred for atrial fibrillation (AF) catheter ablation (CA). Currently, it remains unclear how to improve pre-selection for SDB screening in patients with AF. Aim We aimed to (1) assess the accuracy of the STOP-Bang screening questionnaire for detection of SDB within an AF population referred for CA; (2) derive a refined, AF-specific SDB score to improve pre-selection. Methods Consecutive AF patients referred for CA without a history of SDB and/or SDB screening were included. Patients were digitally referred to the previously implemented Virtual-SAFARI SDB screening and management pathway including a home sleep test. An apnoea–hypopnoea index (AHI) of ≥ 15 was interpreted as moderate-to-severe SDB. Logistic regression analysis was used to assess characteristics associated with moderate-to-severe SDB to refine pre-selection for SDB screening . Results Of 206 included patients, 51% were diagnosed with moderate-to-severe SDB. The STOP-Bang questionnaire performed poorly in detecting SDB, with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) of 0.647 (95% Confidence-Interval (CI) 0.573–0.721). AF-specific refinement resulted in the BOSS-GAP score. Therein, BMI with cut-off point ≥ 27 kg/m 2 and previous stroke or transient ischaemic attack (TIA) were added, while tiredness and neck circumference were removed. The BOSS-GAP score performed better with an AUROC of 0.738 (95% CI 0.672–0.805) in the overall population. Conclusion AF-specific refinement of the STOP-Bang questionnaire moderately improved detection of SDB in AF patients referred for CA. Whether questionnaires bring benefits for pre-selection of SDB compared to structural screening in patients with AF requires further studies. Trial registration number ISOLATION was registered NCT04342312, 13-04-2020.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Betz et al. (2023) conducted a cohort in Atrial fibrillation (n=206). BOSS-GAP score vs. STOP-Bang questionnaire was evaluated on Detection of moderate-to-severe sleep-disordered breathing (AHI ≥ 15) (AUROC 0.738, 95% CI 0.672-0.805). The AF-specific BOSS-GAP score moderately improved the detection of moderate-to-severe sleep-disordered breathing in atrial fibrillation patients compared to the STOP-Bang questionnaire, achieving an AUROC of 0.738.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: