Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Retrospective case-series evaluating the fluocinolone acetonide implant's efficacy in ICI-associated uveitis, suggesting improved outcomes.
PURPOSE: To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of the 0.19 mg fluocinolone acetonide (FAc) intravitreal implant for the management of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-associated uveitis. METHODS: Multicenter retrospective case-series including patients who developed uveitis during ICI therapy and were treated with a 0.19 mg FAc implant. The primary outcome was complete resolution of intraocular inflammation at the last follow-up visit (LFUV). Secondary outcomes included changes in best-reported visual acuity (BRVA), central retinal thickness (CRT), anterior chamber cell (ACC) and flare grades, vitreous haze (VH), intraocular pressure (IOP), need for adjunctive anti-inflammatory therapy, and modifications in ICI treatment. RESULTS: < 0.001 for all comparisons). IOP remained stable, with one transient elevation successfully controlled with topical therapy. Requirement for adjunctive anti-inflammatory treatment declined progressively after implantation. Most patients were able to continue or resume ICI therapy during follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: The 0.19 mg FAc intravitreal implant provided sustained control of inflammation, significant visual improvement, and reduced treatment burden in patients with ICI-associated uveitis. This local therapeutic approach may facilitate continuation of systemic immunotherapy while maintaining ocular disease control.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Llorenç et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: