Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Demonstrates improved vigilance detection using physiological signals in driver monitoring, indicating enhanced safety outcomes.
Vigilance detection using physiological signals is critical for safety-sensitive applications such as driver monitoring. However, accurately capturing vigilance-related patterns across different individuals remains a challenge due to individual variability and weak signal characteristics. This paper presents MHCL, a novel multi-modal framework that integrates electroencephalogram (EEG) and electrooculogram (EOG) signals to enhance vigilance state classification. MHCL introduces three key innovations: (1) a hierarchical contrastive learning mechanism that aligns local and global representations within and across modalities; (2) a dual-stage fusion framework that implements feature-level interaction through cross-modal attention and decision-level integration via an ensembled classifier module; (3) an adversarial domain adaptation strategy with label smoothing to mitigate inter-subject variability and an ensembled classifier to leverage both modality-specific and fused features. Extensive experiments on the SEED-VIG dataset demonstrate leading performance, achieving 96.9% accuracy in subject-dependent settings and 82.0% in cross-subject evaluations, significantly outperforming existing unimodal and multi-modal baselines. Visualization analyses confirm the model's ability to learn semantically aligned and subject-invariant representations. This work provides a robust solution for vigilance detection by addressing key challenges in multi-modal fusion and generalization. The implementation of the proposed MHCL model is publicly available at: https://github.com/xuexiba233/MHCL.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Liu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: