Shows high rates of biomarker discordance in early-stage breast cancer, indicating the need for improved treatment strategies.
Results: 42 studies including 8,317 patients met inclusion criteria.Pooled discordance rates were 19.8% (95% CI 16.9-23.0)for ER, 32.5% (28.4-36.9)for PR, 11.6% (9.1-14.6)for HER2, and 36.9% (30.7-43.6)for Ki-67.Directional changes included ER loss in 13.4% and HER2 gain in 6.8%.Discordance was higher in visceral vs bone metastases (OR 1.42, 1.18-1.71)and after prior endocrine or anti-HER2 therapy.Biomarker reassessment led to treatment modification in 21-28% and was associated with improved progression-free survival when therapy matched metastatic status (HR 0.72-0.84).Conclusions: Primary metastatic biomarker discordance in breast cancer is frequent and clinically consequential, directly influencing therapeutic decisions and outcomes.Routine biopsy and molecular reassessment of metastatic disease should be integrated into clinical pathways to enable truly precision-based treatment and optimize survival.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Buchalter et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: