This paper presents Spectral Quantum Gravity (SQG), a phenomenological framework in which classical spacetime, matter, and gravitation emerge from a timeless two-dimensional resonant spectral substrate Q. The central result is a spectral uniqueness theorem: the gravitational kernel J(a) = a·exp(a)·E₁(a) is the unique ghost-free single-scale non-local modification of General Relativity consistent with four physical axioms (ghost-freedom, single coherence scale, UV recovery of GR, and maximum spectral entropy via the Jaynes principle). Key results include: A rigorous spectral uniqueness theorem for the gravitational propagator modification Parameter-free derivation of the microscopic coherence scale L_micro = 2√(ln2) · l_P ≈ 1.665 l_P from the Bekenstein–Hawking entropy Reproduction of the Hawking temperature from a vortex-dissociation mechanism Covariant field equations and Friedmann equations derived from the non-local action A full Einstein–Boltzmann perturbation hierarchy with three distinct CMB signatures Perturbative stability bound for vortex solutions (a < 1.25) With one fitted cosmological parameter L ≈ 46 Mpc, SQG potentially alleviates the S₈ tension, predicting S₈ ≈ 0.777 A falsifiable prediction for the lensing consistency parameter Σ(k) = J(k²L²) ≠ 1, with peak deviation near k ~ 1/L, testable by Euclid, LSST and DESI The third spatial dimension emerges via a Young-Laplace membrane mechanism driven by vortex pressure. Physical time emerges subsequently as a collective coherence ordering parameter. The Sine-Gordon model on the substrate yields fermions as topological solitons and provides a heuristic geometric motivation for baryon structure. The framework is ghost-free by construction through a positive Källén–Lehmann spectral representation. Dark energy is interpreted as residual global membrane tension. Many aspects remain prospective, and a full likelihood analysis against existing cosmological data is required before observational viability can be claimed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Karol Frank (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: