Validates normative data for the Danish sentence test in normal-hearing individuals, suggesting a new tool for speech assessment.
Background/Objectives: This study describes the development and validation of the Danish Sentence Test (DAST), a Danish-language, adaptive speech-in-noise test constructed from a linguistically balanced corpus using a template-based method. This approach enables controlled linguistic variation while maintaining lexical consistency and may serve as a model for developing similar speech materials in other languages. Methods: Sentences spoken by one female talker from the DAST corpus were sorted into 44 balanced lists of 20 sentences using a psychometric optimization procedure. Speech reception thresholds (SRTs) were measured in 20 normal-hearing participants using headphone playback with speech-shaped noise. Results: Across the 44 sentence lists, the mean SRT was −5.3 dB SNR, with list means within ±0.5 dB of the grand average under the tested configuration. The average within-subject standard deviation was 0.7 dB, and the grand-average psychometric slope was 18.5%/dB. A statistically significant within-session training effect of approximately 0.02 dB per measurement. Conclusions: This study provides normative speech reception threshold (SRT) data for the adaptive Danish Sentence Test (DAST) in normal-hearing listeners under a defined headphone-based speech-in-noise paradigm and demonstrates that the resulting sentence lists yield comparable performance across lists. The template-based construction and optimization approach offers a framework for developing linguistically rich sentence-in-noise tests in other languages.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kressner et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: