Demonstrates selective enrichment of basic peptides in mouse liver, indicating enhanced bioseparation techniques.
Host–guest interactions by artificially synthesized macrocyclic molecules, such as cucurbit[n]uril (CB[n], n refers to the number of glycoluril units), exhibited comparable affinity to natural biological interactions, offering orthogonal selectivities. These unique high-affinity interactions are crucial in bioseparation, particularly in the separation of complex biomacromolecules. However, to date, the application of supramolecular systems in bioseparation remains insufficient and challenging. In this work, a site-specific host–guest interaction-based method by CB[6] and CB[7] was developed for the selective enrichment of basic peptides, and their recognition for basic lysine/arginine (K/R) residues exhibited distinct selectivity. Although they both exhibited affinity to basic peptides, CB[6] tended to bind to peptides containing multiple K/R residues, while CB[7] preferred to adsorb peptides containing both phenylalanine residues and basic K/R residues. This difference was attributed to their distinct cavity sizes. Furthermore, CB[6]-containing monolith was employed for the enrichment of basic peptides from mouse liver sample digested with Staphylococcus aureus protease V8 (Glu-C). It is noteworthy that basic peptides containing 3–4 K/R residues can be successfully enriched, whereas those with more than 5 K/R residues cannot be effectively eluted. It was also observed that 1043 unique peptides were newly identified from 2.5 μg of mouse liver after the capture of basic peptides, with a markable increase in the identification coverage (31%). These newly identified peptides are generally more acidic and shorter than those depleted by CB[6], with median isoelectric point (pI) values of 5.8 and 7.0 and median lengths of 10 and 16 amino acids, respectively.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: