Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Examines timing of ocean closure and subduction in Northeast China, indicating tectonic transitions.
The timing of the Paleo-Asian Ocean closure, the onset of Paleo-Pacific Ocean subduction, and the transition between these events remains highly controversial. The Jilin−Heilongjiang high-pressure metamorphic belt, Northeast China, which formed following the closure of the Jilin−Heilongjiang Ocean, provides well-preserved evidence of this transitional tectonic process. We present whole-rock geochemical data and multi-mineral U-Pb geochronology for the Yilan blueschists within the Jilin−Heilongjiang high-pressure metamorphic belt. Whole-rock major and trace elements indicate that the protoliths of the Yilan blueschists were alkaline basalts formed in an ocean-island setting. The youngest concordant zircon U-Pb ages from the Yilan blueschists are 262 ± 3 Ma, constraining their protolith to the Late Permian. Based on their occurrence and composition, two generations of apatite were identified: Ap-I yielded a U-Pb age of 185 ± 13 Ma, recording prograde subduction to peak blueschist-facies conditions in the Early Jurassic; Ap-II yielded a U-Pb age of 165 ± 10 Ma, reflecting retrograde metamorphism during exhumation in the Middle Jurassic. Integrating these results with published chronological data from the Jilin−Heilongjiang high-pressure metamorphic belt indicates that the Jilin−Heilongjiang Ocean opened during the Early to Middle Permian (288−260 Ma), with subduction initiating in the Late Permian to Early Triassic (260−230 Ma). Driven by westward subduction of the Paleo-Pacific plate, further subduction of the Jilin−Heilongjiang Ocean occurred from the Early Triassic to Early Jurassic (230−185 Ma), culminating in the amalgamation of the Jiamusi−Khanka Block with the Songliao Block.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Li et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: