PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 24, 2026Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering0 citations

Mechanisms of the Interaction Behaviors of Asphalt Mastic–Mineral Interface Structures

View Full Paper
TSTao ShenYMYuanyuan MengZCZhaojie Chen

Key Points

  • This study aims to understand the differences in interaction behaviors between asphalt mastic–mineral and asphalt binder–mineral interfaces.
  • Investigated two-phase interface structures: asphalt mastic–mineral and asphalt binder–mineral.
  • Applied improved stripping rate tests and pull-off tensile strength characterization.
  • Utilized surface energy theory to analyze interfacial behavior differences.
  • Observed significant discrepancies (up to 58.7%) in interfacial properties between the two sets of structures.
  • Identified dual effects of fillers on interfacial performance, influencing adhesion and stress concentration.
  • Elucidated mechanisms by which hydrodynamic conditioning and asphalt modification affect both interfaces.

Abstract

The interfacial structure between adhesive and mineral constitutes a critical determinant of asphalt pavement durability and stability. Current research on interfacial interaction (adhesion and stripping) behavior, derived from the asphalt binder–mineral interfacial system, demonstrates systematic biases from actual asphalt mixtures where asphalt mastic serves as the functional adhesive medium. This study investigated two sets of two-phase interface structures: asphalt mastic–mineral and asphalt binder–mineral. Through systematic application of improved stripping rate test, pull-off tensile strength (POTS) characterization, and surface energy theory, differences in the interaction behavior between two sets of two-phase interface structures were identified, and the underlying mechanisms responsible for these differences were elucidated. The results demonstrated that the evaluation of interfacial properties using asphalt binder as the adhesive in asphalt mixtures exhibits significant systematic bias. Significant discrepancies (up to 58.7%) were observed in interfacial properties (stripping rate, POTS, and surface energy parameters) between the two sets of structures. Notably, the governing mechanisms by which hydrodynamic conditioning, asphalt modification, and mineral lithology influence the binder–mineral interface remain applicable to the mastic–mineral system. Crucially, the distinct interaction behaviors between these two interfacial systems arise primarily from filler incorporation, which exerts dual effects: positively, fillers induce colloidal structure reorganization in asphalt, enhancing interfacial intermolecular forces and adhesion property at the interface; negatively, fillers simultaneously amplify localized stress concentration and elevate water affinity within the interface, thereby reducing POTS and water-induced damage resistance. This study elucidates the differences in interaction mechanisms between mastic–mineral and binder–mineral interfaces. The findings provide insights into the interaction behaviors of asphalt mixture interface structure.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Shen et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a12960648a0ea166567281chttps://doi.org/10.1061/jmcee7.mteng-22388
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper