This essay demonstrates the significance of material narrativity in tree rings, suggesting implications for narrative scholarship.
This essay represents an evolving conversation between a dendrochronologist or tree ring scientist and a narrative theorist. Our project of applied narratology uses narrative theory to read tree rings—a rich example of texts featuring what we call material narrativity in their clear representation of a sequence of events in their annual accumulation—and illustrates the practical and social significance of contemporary narratological scholarship. Alternating between our voices, we (1) introduce a case study of narrative featuring material narrativity, (2) place the tree ring narrative within a narratological context, (3) produce a revised interpretation of this narrative and a second case study using narratological concepts, and (4) explain what pressures such narratives might exert on contemporary narrative scholarship and dendrochronological practices. Our back-and-forth discussion ultimately advocates for and highlights the potentials of a narratologically-infused form of tree ring sciences, or what we playfully call dendronarratology . We also pitch two expansions to a narratological lexicon that dendronarratology provokes: an expansion of transmedial narratology to include material-specific narratological resources (in addition to media-specific ones) and a more capacious understanding of authorship in light of our recognition of trees as experiencing—and authoring—agents. Thus, we argue for a greater call for narrative scholars to delve deeper into the ecology of narratives.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
James et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: