This analysis reveals the practical impact of presidential veto powers on legislative accountability in India, indicating their essential role in democracy.
The President of India is the constitutional head of the State and the formal, nominal Executive, as well as the Supreme Commander of the Armed Forces, possessing significant legislative and judicial powers. Article 111 of the Constitution empowers the President to withhold assent to bills passed by Parliament, thereby acting as a check against hasty legislation, while Article 74 places the President in a pivotal role as a silent guardian of the Constitution. Although often perceived as a ceremonial figure, the President’s veto powers: absolute, suspensive, and pocket, play a crucial role in maintaining the system of checks and balances essential to Indian democracy. This paper explains these forms of veto and analyzes historical instances, including the actions of Presidents A.P.J. Abdul Kalam and Giani Zail Singh, to demonstrate that the veto is not merely symbolic but a practical constitutional safeguard. Despite limitations introduced by the 42nd and 44th Amendments, the veto remains an essential instrument for ensuring legislative accountability and protecting constitutional values.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Karnais et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: