Examines legal accountability and environmental governance after the Bhopal Gas Tragedy, indicating the need for stronger enforcement.
The Bhopal Gas Tragedy of 1984 exposed the profound weaknesses in India’s industrial safety system and the absence of a robust legal framework to prevent and respond to large-scale environmental disasters. The purpose of this study is to examine whether the precautionary principle and equitable justice, developed in response to the Bhopal Gas Tragedy, have been effectively operationalized within India’s environmental regulatory framework. Using a doctrinal and analytical research methodology based on statutory analysis and landmark case-law review. The results reveal that although India has made significant doctrinal progress toward a preventive, accountability-based system of environmental governance, major gaps persist in regulatory enforcement, corporate criminal accountability, public participation, and long-term victim rehabilitation. Industrial disasters occurring decades after Bhopal further indicate the weak implementation of precautionary obligations. The study concludes that while India’s legal framework has evolved substantially in principle, its effectiveness depends on strengthening enforcement institutions, ensuring transparent compliance, enhancing community participation, and adopting stronger liability mechanisms to realize true precautionary and equitable justice.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
KUMARI et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: