Assesses alignment of validated EPAs with performance outcomes for pharmacists, suggesting improved credentialing pathways.
This study aimed to evaluate the suitability of previously validated Entrustable Professional Activities (EPAs) for pharmacists carrying out medication management reviews (MMRs) and further align them with nationally accepted performance outcomes (POs). This was a two-phase study involving Subject-Matter Experts (SMEs). Phase 1 aimed at assessing the relevance of 14 EPAs previously validated for use in a provisionally registered pharmacist training programme to the role of MMR pharmacists utilising a five-point Likert scale. A 70% threshold for “agree” and “strongly agree” was used to qualify an EPA for phase 2. During phase 2, EPAs were mapped for their ability to demonstrate APC performance outcomes for MMRs and the results were descriptively reported. Of the eight SMEs recruited, seven completed both surveys. Of the 14 EPAs, 12 qualified for phase 2. In phase 2, the 12 EPAs were mapped against 24 POs. Five EPAs were matched with 100% agreement to six POs. To our knowledge, this is the first study of its kind to map pre-validated EPAs to POs for credentialing in the scope of MMR pharmacists in Australia. A total of 12 EPAs were applicable to pharmacists working in the MMR space, and five were able to be directly mapped to six POs.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Abeyaratne et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: