Randomized trial investigates the role of disaster risk and model uncertainty on equity premiums, suggesting new insights into asset pricing.
This study develops a production-based asset pricing model that incorporates time-varying disaster risk together with model uncertainty. Within an extended relative-entropy framework, agents’ distorted beliefs and ambiguity aversion are characterized, and the corresponding Hamilton–Jacobi–Bellman–Isaacs (HJBI) equation is derived under a stochastic robust-control setting. The framework implies that the equity premium can be decomposed into three components: diffusion and jump risk premiums associated with conventional risk aversion and an additional rare-event premium generated by ambiguity aversion. Numerical experiments show that ambiguity aversion reduces the equilibrium risk-free rate, whereas aversion to rare disasters significantly raises compensation for bearing risk, helping reconcile both the equity premium puzzle and the risk-free rate puzzle. In addition, equity return volatility increases with the probability of disaster events, but at a diminishing rate. Overall, the results underscore the importance of model uncertainty and time-varying disaster risk in the determination of asset prices and risk premia.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ren et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: