Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Objectives To assess the prevalence of parasymphyseal bone marrow oedema (BME) and cleft signs (CS) in pelvic 1.5-Tesla MRI of a general population sample, to evaluate associations with potential determinants, and to assess whether these findings relate to available self-reported pain variables.Methods A random sample of 1,000 subjects (mean age 51.5 years; 52% female) from the SHIP-Trend-0 cohort underwent standardized pelvic MRI using a coronal TIRM sequence.BME was assessed regarding laterality, extent, and signal intensity; CS were classified as present or absent.Associations with age, sex, BMI, sports activity, occupation, number of pregnancies, and available pain variables were analyzed exploratively using chi-square tests, Mann-Whitney U tests, and binary logistic regression.Results After exclusion of 14 non-diagnostic examinations, 986 subjects were analyzed.BME was detected in 11.1% (95% CI 9.2%-13.2%),with bilateral distribution in 5.5%.Mean BME extent was 8.9 mm.CS were present in 6.0% (95% CI 4.7%-7.6%).BME was not associated with sex, BMI, sports activity, occupation, or available pain variables.CS were more frequent in women (p = 0.015).Number of pregnancies showed a borderline exploratory association with BME (OR 1.238 per pregnancy, 95% CI 1.008-1.521,p = 0.042).Conclusion Parasymphyseal BME and CS are relatively frequent MRI findings in the general population (11.1% and 6.0%).No association was detected with available pain, sports activity, or occupation variables, but findings require cautious interpretation given non-specific symptom assessment and exploratory analyses.These background prevalences should be considered when evaluating suspected osteitis pubis to avoid overdiagnosis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Beyer et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: