Key result
Paced breathing at 6 rpm and 12 rpm caused a limited redistribution of heartbeats toward inspiration and high respiratory volumes, suggesting marginal physiological relevance.
Why the study?
Does spontaneous and paced breathing alter the distribution of heartbeats within the respiratory cycle in healthy humans?
Observational
Does spontaneous and paced breathing alter the distribution of heartbeats within the respiratory cycle in healthy humans?
The redistribution of heartbeats within the respiratory cycle during breathing is limited in magnitude and likely an effect of overall cardio-respiratory interactions rather than directly caused by respiratory sinus arrhythmia.
Limited redistribution during paced breathing warrants no clinical adjustment; leaves open RSA-independent mechanisms of cardio-respiratory coupling.
The capability of respiratory sinus arrhythmia (RSA) to generate privileged locations for the occurrence of R-peaks within the respiratory cycle has been questioned in recent works, challenging the hypothesis that RSA might play a role in improving pulmonary gas exchange. We assessed such a capability submitting healthy humans to spontaneous and paced breathing (SB and PB) protocols, estimating the fraction of beats occurring during inspiration, at low, medium, and high respiratory volumes, and during the first and second half of inspiration and expiration. Then, the same fractions were computed assuming a random uniform distribution of heartbeats, and the differences were compared. The results found are as follows: (1) during PB at 6 rpm, heartbeats redistribute toward inspiration; (2) during SB and PB at 12 rpm, heartbeats tend to cluster when respiratory volume is high; (3) since such redistributions are limited in magnitude, it is possible that its physiological relevance is marginal, for instance, in terms of within-cycle variations in lung perfusion; (4) two groups of subjects with considerably different levels of RSA showed similar redistribution of heartbeats, suggesting that this phenomenon might be an underlying effect of the overall cardio-respiratory interactions, and not directly of RSA.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lopes et al. (2011) conducted an observational in Healthy. Spontaneous and paced breathing (SB and PB) protocols vs. Random uniform distribution of heartbeats was evaluated on Fraction of beats occurring during inspiration, at varying respiratory volumes, and during halves of inspiration and expiration. Paced breathing at 6 rpm and 12 rpm caused a limited redistribution of heartbeats toward inspiration and high respiratory volumes, suggesting marginal physiological relevance.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: