Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Cultural critics often view the sympathy that white audiences may feel when encountering African-American culture as a process of co-optation that does little to upset racial hierarchies. To complicate the predominant critical view that cross-racial sympathy is inevitably imperialistic, this article offers a reception study of Oprah Winfrey’s televised Book Club programs, focusing on white female fans discussing black women’s fiction. While some white readers displayed a problematic ‘color-blindness’ with imperialist overtones, others experienced transformative identifications with black subjects and a reflective alienation from white privilege. Although cross-racial sympathy can often devolve into a colonizing appropriation, my reception analysis underscores the important role that empathetic crossings within cultural space can play in the development of anti-racist coalitions. In examining the relationship of fiction reading to political change, I argue that the public and private spheres are intertwined rather than diametrically opposed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kimberly Chabot Davis (2004) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: